Where Biden and Democrats oppose abortion access 3 weeks after stalled fight

However, many progressives and abortion providers have expressed concern that these measures are not enough to reduce the impact of government restrictions.

“Maybe the reality is that nothing can be done at the federal level. If so, it should scare everyone,” said Robin Marty, director of operations for the West Alabama Women’s Center. last week.

Overall effect? The stalemate is among Democrats at the highest levels of government, especially when it comes to pushing the limits on additional protections.

Here’s more on what the stalled fight for access to abortion has looked like over the past seven days.

CONGRESS

Democrats Will Attempt (and Likely Fail) to Pass Abortion Protection Bill

Democrats on Capitol Hill this week will respond to enormous pressure act quickly on abortion rights legislation. They have faced pressure in recent weeks – from voters to the White House – to challenge the Supreme Court’s ruling, prompting Democrats to draft legislation to address the issue.

But their efforts are likely to be in vain, and they know it.

The votes are essentially doomed once they face an evenly divided Senate, where the 60-vote threshold to pass legislation is likely not to break widespread Republican opposition to abortion. Bills introduced this week protect the right to travel for abortion services, and another that explicitly grants health care providers and patients the right to have or have an abortion.

So what’s the point? The move signals to Democratic supporters that they are ready to stand up for their values ​​by portraying Republicans as out of touch with popular opinion about abortion rights.

In a letter to the Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told colleagues that management would consider additional legislative steps. House Democrats also plan to pass more abortion rights legislation soon, including measures that will protect the confidentiality of patient medical records, which some fear could be used by law enforcement to track pregnancies and enforce restrictions.

SKOT

Biden Draws Criticism Ahead of Potential Legal Battles

FROM Caviar was abolished, the Progressives demanded that the president soften the powers of the executive branch to protect abortion. But Biden’s legal team has come to terms with the harsh reality that any drastic action that goes against the Supreme Court’s ruling is likely to be rejected by the court.

Nearly every option the White House has tried or considered is at risk of being challenged in court, administration officials and legal experts say. Officials are still trying to find the path of least resistance to defend abortion rights three weeks after they were stripped of the federal right. Meanwhile, Biden himself is downplaying his ability to provide protection, urging Congress to pass legislation and voters to elect Democrats in November’s midterm elections.

“I know it’s frustrating and a lot of people are very angry,” Biden said in his remarks on Friday. “But the truth is, and I’m not the only one saying this… when you read the decision, the court made it clear that it won’t protect women’s rights.”

While Biden’s hands may be tied, critics continue to blame the administration for not preparing for this moment. They argue that steps could have been taken months before to review the legality of taking measures to protect against abortion. After all, the opportunity Caviar repeal has been discussed for years, including during each of the confirmation hearings of the three judges appointed by President Donald Trump.

[Read more: Biden’s abortion response curbed by fears of another Supreme Court showdown]

ELECTIONS

Democrat indictment continues

Echoing Biden’s calls in recent weeks, Vice President Kamala Harris explicitly called on Congress to act on protecting access to abortion, focusing the attention of Democratic lawmakers on who is responsible and able to provide protection after the decision of the highest court.

“So what does that mean?” Harris said in a CBS “Face the Nation” interview. “That means we have an election in 120+ days, it will be about who will serve in Congress, and we need a pro-choice Congress.”

She stressed the need for voters to consider candidates lower on the ballot who support abortion rights, rather than focusing exclusively on more prominent lawmakers. The court’s decision last month allows states to decide whether to retain protection against abortion or introduce outright prohibitions that some have already put into state law.

“You don’t have to defend or believe it’s right for you or your family, but don’t let the government decide for her family, whoever she is,” Harris said. “That means government agencies, governors, secretaries of state, attorneys general. That means local races on who’s going to be your district attorney, who’s going to be your sheriff, enforcing the laws that are being passed to criminalize health care providers, and maybe even women who seek this service.”

Along with criticism the Biden administration has faced for not being aggressive enough to protect access to abortion, Democrats in Congress have faced criticism in recent weeks for not codifying Caviar into federal law when they controlled the White House, House of Representatives, and Senate under President Barack Obama.

LAWYERS

Court expansion supporters see justification for their convictions six months later

Some members of a bipartisan panel that studied the structure and composition of the Supreme Court six months ago told POLITICO they now regret the Biden administration has not considered more aggressive reforms, including an expansion of the court.

The commission’s actual recommendations were moderate and did not include adding more seats to the court. But some pro-expansion members said the court’s recent rulings confirm their beliefs.

“It’s absurd. Of course we have to do something,” said former US District Judge Nancy Gertner, who served on the Biden commission. “When you read the draft … and then you watched the court do whatever it wanted. I changed. “

Biden’s allies backed down, arguing it’s not worth spending political influence on something without a clear majority public support or Democratic congressmen.

“[A]Removing the judges, which even the most determined supporters fail to appreciate in Congress, will detract from the only path needed to restore Rowe, which is congressional action once we have enough votes,” Biden ally POLITICO said. “He’s focused on achieving results in real life.”

[Read more: Biden’s court commission appointees: We told you so on expanding the court]

PROTECTION

Progressives push to add access to abortion for military personnel to mandatory defense bill

And finally, some Democrats in Congress want to change the annual defense legislation to protect military access to abortions. The proposed amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act would loosen restrictions on abortions in military medical facilities and on Pentagon funding of abortions.

Rep. Veronica EscobarDemocrat from Texas, said her office was “inundated with calls from female service members” from other states who ended up in Texas, where abortion is illegal.

“It’s a matter of readiness. As much as some of our colleagues on the Republican side refuse to understand, this is a matter of preparedness,” Escobar said.

An amendment introduced by the chairman of the Congressional Progressive Group. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) And representatives. Jackie Speyer (California) and Anthony Brown (D-Md.) – voting is not guaranteed.

[Read more: Progressives eye longshot bid to protect abortion rights for troops]